Commonwealth v. Jones
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
HOFFMAN, Judge:
Appellant contends that: 1) the evidence is insufficient to support the verdict; and 2) trial counsel was ineffective because he: a) was burdened by a conflict of interest caused by his representation of both appellant and a co-defendant; b) failed to object to a defective pretrial colloquy in which appellant waived the right to separate counsel; c) failed to object to a defective colloquy in which appellant waived his right to trial by jury; and d) failed to object that appellant was convicted and sentenced illegally for two inchoate crimes. We agree that counsel was…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Washington v. MaroneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Commonwealth v. BoydSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. TateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Commonwealth v. GardnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Commonwealth v. WestbrookSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Commonwealth v. DantzlerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Commonwealth v. MathisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Commonwealth v. GumpertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Commonwealth v. TodtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Commonwealth v. GolinskySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.