Legal Opinion

Cleeland v. Cleeland

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 8, 1958No. 165PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRodmaN, J.

Respondent challenges the validity of Judge Moore’s order on these grounds: (1) Habeas corpus is not available to determine the right to the custody of children whose parents have been divorced in another State; (2) refusal of her request for continuance; (3) the Virginia decree awarding custody is entitled to full faith and credit and by reason thereof the courts of North Carolina are forbidden to presently inquire into her right to custody. Respondent did not plead the Virginia decree as a defense. Apparently the force of the Virginia order was not raised in the court below.

Prior to 1957…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. New York Ex Rel. Halvey v. HalveySupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Morris v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Robertson v. PickrellSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  4. Wicks v. CoxTexas Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Gloth v. GlothSupreme Court of Virginia · 1930

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. BaldwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. In re C.J.H.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Spence v. DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  4. In Re the Custody of SaulsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  5. State v. CarterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API