Legal Opinion
Proctor v. United States
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided January 22, 1990No. Civ. No. Y-89-1600. Crim. No. Y-85-0547PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
JOSEPH H. YOUNG, Senior District Judge.
Petitioner Maurice C. Proctor, Sr., an inmate at the Lewisburg federal prison, Lewisburg, Pennsylvania, has filed a pro se motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence. Three grounds for relief are raised in the Motion: (1) the government’s failure to establish subject matter jurisdiction and to prove the offense as charged; (2) improper jury instructions; and (3) ineffective assistance of counsel. The Government’s Response to Plaintiff’s Motion and the Plaintiff’s Traverse to the Government’s Response are also before…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. AddonizioSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. Anthony Frank Gaggi, Henry Borelli, Peter Lafroscia, Ronald Ustica, Edward Rendini and Ronald TurekianCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Lebron-GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Oken v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- Gilliam v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
- Anderson v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2007
- Leonard Epps v. United States of America, Maurice C. Proctor, Sr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
- Marshall v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.