Legal Opinion

Marshall v. United States

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided November 9, 2006No. Criminal L-00-033; Civil L-04-465Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

LEGG, Chief Judge.

Pending is pro se petitioner Ronald E. Marshall’s (“Marshall”) motion to vacate his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Because the facts and legal arguments are adequately set forth in the existing record, an evidentiary hearing is not necessary. 1 For the reasons set forth below, the Court will, by separate Order, DENY Marshall’s motion and DIRECT the Clerk to CLOSE the case. 2

1. Background

On January 27, 2000, a federal grand jury indicted Marshall and thirteen co-defendants for conspiracy to sell and offer for sale drug paraphernalia and conspiracy to aid and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. Texas v. CobbSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. United States v. RoaneCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API