Legal Opinion

United States v. Yaden

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided May 23, 1958No. 10,834PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

Robert E. Quinn, Chief Judge:

At the accused’s trial for desertion the law officer instructed the court-martial in part as follows:

“You are advised that if the absence without proper authority is much prolonged, and there is no satisfactory explanation of it, these facts are circumstantial evidence from which the court may be justified in inferring an intent to remain away permanently.
“Of course, the questions of what constitutes a much prolonged absence and what constitutes a satisfactory explanation are questions for the court to determine. The explanation need not be one…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. SoccioUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  2. United States v. CothernUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  3. United States v. NoeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1956

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. FarrisUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API