Legal Opinion

United States v. Provident National Bank

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 22, 1966No. Civ. A. No. 40033PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CLARY, Chief Judge.

This is a Rule 34 motion to compel the production of bank examiner reports, prepared and filed by bank examiners of the Comptroller of the Currency. Involved are the following reports:(1) Eight reports on the Central-Penn National Bank from 1961 to 1966;(2) Six reports on the Central-Penn National Bank Trust Department from 1961 to 1966;(3) One report on the Provident National Bank dated 1965, and(4) One report on the Provident National Bank Trust Department dated 1965.

However, for the purposes of this motion to produce, the reports must be divided into two…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. Third National Bank of NashvilleDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1966

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re Franklin National Bank Securities LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1979
  2. In Re Subpoena Served Upon the Comptroller of the Currency, and the Secretary of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve SystemCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
  3. Denny v. CareyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Delozier v. First National Bank of GatlinburgDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1986
  5. Schreiber v. Society for Savings Bancorp, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API