Legal Opinion

State v. Wiley

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 20, 1974No. 7418SC120PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CARSON, Judge.

The only question presented on appeal is whether the trial court erred in failing to allow the motion in arrest of judgment. If the warrant was not valid, the motion should have been allowed.

It is well established in this State that a bill of indictment or a warrant is insufficient to confer jurisdiction unless it charges all essential elements of a criminal offense. State v. Morgan, 226 N.C. 414, 38 S.E. 2d 166 (1946); 4 Strong’s N. C. Index 2d, Indictment and Warrant, § 9. While the warrant apparently attempted to charge a violation of G.S. 20-166, it has failed in two vital…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. . MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  2. State v. OvermanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  3. State v. ChavisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. LucasCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API