Legal Opinion

Schwanck v. Davis

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1888PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to the district court for Madison county. Tried below before Norris, J. cited : Story on Agency, Sec. 37. McMillan v. Mackenzie, 2 Green (Iowa), 268-271.

1Opinion of the CourtMaxwell, J.

This is an action in replevin brought by the plaintiff against the defendant to recover certain goods upon which the defendant had a chattel mortgage. The defendant in his answer states his right to the goods, as follows: “ That as such sheriff, on or about the 3d day of July, 1886, he took the.said goods and chattels mentioned in plaintiff’s petition as the goods of August Weigand and Bernard Strotman, comprising the firm of Weigand and Strotman, by virtue of an execution issued by H. D. Kelly, county judge of Madison county, Nebraska, on the 1st day of July, 1886, which said execution was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Faler v. JordanMississippi Supreme Court · 1870
  2. Carrier v. CameronMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Church v. SparrowNew York Supreme Court · 1830
  4. Onondaga County Bank v. De PuyNew York Supreme Court · 1837
  5. Pearce v. . WilkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1849

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Stevens v. McLachlanMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Peck v. TingleyNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Waltham Piano Co. v. PiersonNebraska Supreme Court · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API