Legal Opinion

Hart v. Vogel

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 15, 1930No. [No. 2, April Term, 1930.]PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBond, C. J.

The appellant, as plaintiff, sued in trover for a wrongful conversion by the appellee’s decedent, Fred A. Vogel, of shares of stock in four corporations, the certificates for which had been delivered by her to him endorsed in blank; and the single question urged is one of the legal sufficiency of her evidence to prove the wrongful conversion. A verdict against her contentions was rendered under an instruction of the court because of insufficiency of the evidence. .The statutory provision for excluding testimony by a party in such a suit against an executrix, Code, art. 35, see. 3, necessarily…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Levi v. BoothCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1882
  2. Thomson v. GortnerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1891
  3. Taliaferro v. First National BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1889
  4. Ross v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
  5. Deutsch ex rel. Kanders v. BondCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1877

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Goldman v. Johnson Motor Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1949
  2. Maryland Casualty Co. v. WolffCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API