Legal Opinion

United States v. Honolulu Plantation Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 4, 1903No. 896PublishedCited by 13 opinions

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the District of Hawaii.

1Opinion of the Court

ROSS, Circuit Judge.

This action was brought by the United States to condemn 561.2 acres of land bordering on Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, on which to establish a naval station. The fee of the land having been acquired by the government, the only question presented for trial in the court below was the amount of compensation to be made by the government for two certain leasehold interests in the land sought to be taken, held by the defendant Honolulu Plantation Company. One of those leases expires by its terms in the year 1908, and the other then commences and continues for a long period. The 561.2…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Monongahela Navigation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Boom Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  3. Bauman v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. Vicksburg & Meridian Railroad v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  5. Backus v. Fort Street Union Depot Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Baetjer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1944
  2. Westchester County Park Commission v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
  3. United States v. Honolulu Plantation Co. Honolulu Plantation Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
  4. West Virginia Pulp & Paper Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1952
  5. Housing Finance & Development Corp. v. FergusonHawaii Supreme Court · 1999

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API