Westchester County Park Commission v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FRANK, Circuit Judge.
1. Under the Fifth Amendment, the owner of land taken by condemnation is entitled to “just compensation.” The key notion is indemnity, measured in money, for the owner’s loss of the condemned property. In an effort to definitize this notion, it has been said that it requires the payment of a sum equal to the “value” of the property taken. But if “just compensation” is a baffling indefinite concept, “value” is no loss so. To mouth it is not to answer but to ask a question. In the condemnation cases, the courts, trying to contrive a practical standard,- have adopted the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Monongahela Navigation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Boom Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- United States Ex Rel. Tennessee Valley Authority v. PowelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States v. Chandler-Dunbar Water Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- United States v. SowardsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
- City of Trenton v. LenznerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
- United States v. The Meadow Brook ClubCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
- United States v. Certain Parcels of Land in Rapides ParishCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1945
- United States v. Certain Parcels of LandDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1953
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.