Legal Opinion · Dissent

Caesars Riverboat Casino, LLC v. Kephart

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 2010No. 31S01-0909-CV-403Published

1DissentDickson, Justice

In my view, the result in this case is particularly disturbing. The Court today holds that a gambling casino may with impunity entice a person the casino knows to be a pathological gambler by offering free transportation from Tennessee to the Indiana casino, providing her with a free hotel room, food, and alcohol, and then extending her credit to gamble at the casino where she not surprisingly suffers $125,000 in casino gambling losses. These facts call for application of the well-established principle of Indiana common law that business owners must use reasonable care to protect their…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Burrell v. MeadsIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Collier v. PraterIndiana Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Picadilly, Inc. v. ColvinIndiana Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Bartrom v. Adjustment Bureau, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Scott County School District One v. Asher Ex Rel. McClureIndiana Supreme Court · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API