Hill v. Diamond
District Court, E.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
WALTER E. HOFFMAN, Chief Judge.
Motions for summary judgment having been filed by the defendants and the issues being identical in each case, the uncontroverted facts are that Diamond Construction Company, hereinafter referred to as “Diamond” is the prime contractor for the construction of a vehicular tunnel to be laid on the bottom of the Elizabeth River connecting the cities of Norfolk and Portsmouth. When completed, the tunnel will consist of twelve sections or “tubes”. Each tube is separately prepared for sinking to the river bottom and, when one tube is completed, another is towed from…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Senko v. LaCrosse Dredging Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Desper v. Starved Rock Ferry Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Butler v. WhitemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- GRIMES v. RAYMOND CONCRETE PILE CO. Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- McKie v. Diamond Marine Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Creel v. the Drill Tender Jack CleverlyDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1966
- Bay Point Condominium Ass'n v. RML Corp.Norfolk County Circuit Court · 2001
- Johnson v. Noble Drilling CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1966
- Johns Bros. Security v. JenningsVirginia Circuit Court · 2003
- McCabe v. ReedNorfolk County Circuit Court · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.