Legal Opinion

United States v. Moritz Broker, and Pasquale Maisiello, John Maisiello, Henry Wegner, S. Brukirer and P.M. Transfer Co., Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided July 16, 1957No. 24357_1PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

The jury found the appellant guilty on three counts: the first charging the introduction of watch movements into the United States by means of a false statement, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 542; the second charging the receipt and concealment of the watch movements after importation into the United States “contrary to law,” in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 545; and the third charging a conspiracy to commit the substantive crimes charged in the first two counts. Concurrent sentences were imposed; two years on Count 1 and five years each on Counts 2 and 3.

The appeal is principally based upon a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. United States v. DebrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. United States v. LepowitchSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. United States v. JosephsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
  5. Lurton Lewis Heflin, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. Miles Dearden, Jr., Alex Goldstein and Leonard NikoloricCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  2. United States v. ValentineDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1968
  3. United States v. Rattan Lal AggarwalCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  4. United States v. Dinty Warmington Whiting, James R. Crowe and Walter J. SarnitzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  5. United States v. SoblenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API