Legal Opinion

People v. Dye

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 7, 1974No. 73-127PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Seidenfeld

Defendants Stephen Dye and Carl D. Prater were found guilty of armed robbery after a jury trial and each sentenced to 10-30 years in the penitentiary. Defendants contend on appeal that the court erred in allowing evidence of Prater’s prior conviction by reading from an unauthenticated court file; and erred in instructing the jury as to the effect of prior convictions over defendants’ objections. Alternatively, they contend that their sentences are excessive and should be reduced.

The charges against defendants arose from the robbery of a jewelry store on May 30, 1972, at 11 A.M. Both employees…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. The People v. FlynnIllinois Supreme Court · 1956
  2. The PEOPLE v. NeukomIllinois Supreme Court · 1959
  3. People v. SmithAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965
  4. The PEOPLE v. SquiresIllinois Supreme Court · 1963
  5. The People v. HalkensIllinois Supreme Court · 1944

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. DavisIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
  2. People v. TurnerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  3. People v. MitchellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  4. Burrell v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  5. Filrep S. A. v. BarryAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API