Legal Opinion

Charles and Mary Harter v. Director of Revenue

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided January 31, 2017No. SC95532Published

1Opinion of the CourtPaul C. Wilson, Judge

The Administrative Hearing Commission , (“Commission”) determined that Charles and Mary Harter (the “Harters”) improperly calculated their income eligibility for purposes of the Property Tax Credit (“PTC”) under sections 135.010 to 135.035. 1 The Commission found that the entire amount of Mr. Harter’s social security and annuity payments should be included in their “income” for PTC purposes under section 135,010(5). As a result, the Commission found that the Harters were eligible only for a reduced PTC for the 2010 tax year under section 135.030.2 and that they were not eligible for any PTC…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Brown v. Missouri Secretary of StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
  2. St. Louis Country Club v. Administrative Hearing CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  3. Moore Automotive Group, Inc. v. GoffsteinSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
  4. Bartlett & Co. Grain v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  5. J.C. Nichols Co. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API