Legal Opinion
In Re Frankel
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided February 13, 1956PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
20 N.J. 588 (1956)
120 A.2d 603
IN THE MATTER OF CHARLES FRANKEL, AN ATTORNEY-AT-LAW.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued October 17 and November 21, 1955.
Decided February 13, 1956.
For the rule: Mr. Harold H. Fisher, by designation of the court.
Contra: Mr. John E. Toolan (Mr. Sam Weiss, on the brief; Messrs. Toolan, Haney & Romond, attorneys).
The opinion of the court was delivered by HEHER, J.
The respondent attorney-at-law, in practice at Asbury Park, was ruled to show cause why he should not be disbarred or disciplined for violations of sections 28 and 34 of the Canons of Professional…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Interstate Circuit, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Ex Parte RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Ex Parte WallSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Commercial Molasses Corp. v. New York Tank Barge Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- In Re DurantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1907
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re IntrocasoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- In Re BreggSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1972
- In Re the Alleged Unethical Conduct of RichSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960