Legal Opinion
Floral Trade Council v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided May 25, 1993No. Court 92-06-00393PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RESTANI, Judge:
This matter is before the court on plaintiffs Rule 56.1 motion for judgment upon the agency record. This is a challenge to the final results of the fourth administrative review of an antidumping order. Certain Fresh Cut Flowers from, Mexico, 57 Fed.Reg. 19,597 (Dep’t Comm.1992) (final results of antidumping duty admin, review) (hereinafter “Final Results ”). Plaintiff, Floral Trade Council (“FTC”), protests the decision of the International Trade Administration (“ITA”) to calculate a single unified antidumping duty rate, which would be applied to all shippers, both old…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Rhone Poulenc, Inc. And Rhone Poulenc Chimie De Base, S.A. v. The United States, Pq CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Timken Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987
- Hercules, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987
- Ipsco, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Koenig & Bauer-Albert AG v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998
- Transcom, Inc., and L & S Bearing Company v. Unite States, and the Timken CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Magnesuim Corp. of America v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1996
- J.S. Stone, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2003
- AK Steel Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.