Legal Opinion

In Re Foot Locker, Inc.

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Decided May 26, 2011No. MDL No. 2812PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TRANSFER ORDER

JOHN G. HEYBURN II, Chairman.

Before the Panel: * Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, defendants Foot Locker, Inc., and Foot Locker Retail, Inc. (collectively Foot Locker) move to centralize this litigation in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. This litigation currently consists of four actions pending in four districts, as listed on Schedule A. Plaintiffs in all actions oppose centralization.

On the basis of the papers filed and hearing session held, we find that these actions involve common questions of fact, and that centralization in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania will…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re Tyson Foods, Inc., Meat Processing Facilities Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2008
  2. In Re Bank of America Wage & Hour Employment Practices LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2010

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re Amazon.com, Inc., Fulfillment Center Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) & Wage & Hour LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2014
  2. In Re Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC Wage & Hour Employment Practices LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2011
  3. In re Wells Fargo Wage & Hour Employment Practices LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API