In re Wells Fargo Wage & Hour Employment Practices Litigation
United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
1Opinion of the Court
TRANSFER ORDER
JOHN G. HEYBURN II, Chairman.
Before the Panel:* Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, affiliated Wells Fargo defendants 1 move to centralize this litigation in the Southern District of Texas. This litigation consists of four actions pending in three districts, as listed on Schedule A. Plaintiffs in the two Southern District of Texas actions do not oppose the motion. Plaintiffs in the District of New Jersey and the Western District of Washington oppose centralization.
On the basis of the papers filed and hearing session held, we find that these actions involve common questions of fact,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re Smith Patent LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1976
- In Re CVS Caremark Corp. Wage & Hour Employment Practices LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2010
- In Re Foot Locker, Inc.United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2011
- In Re AT & T Mobility Wireless Data Services Sales Tax LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2010
- In Re Wells Fargo Home Mort. Overtime Pay Lit.United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2006