Legal Opinion

United States v. Murphy

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 20, 2008No. 06-30582PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:

Defendant Murphy appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence seized as a result of two searches. We conclude that one search was lawful and one was not. The first search, a protective sweep of storage units following Murphy’s arrest, was justified by the officer’s legitimate concern about the potential presence of confederates in the area. We conclude that the district court’s ruling as to this search was correct. The second search occurred two hours later, after Murphy, who was residing in the units temporarily, had refused to consent but…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Horton v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Illinois v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Griffin v. ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. Fernandez v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  3. United States v. ShraderCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
  4. United States v. HendersonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  5. Friedman v. BoucherCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API