United States v. Murphy
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:
Defendant Murphy appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence seized as a result of two searches. We conclude that one search was lawful and one was not. The first search, a protective sweep of storage units following Murphy’s arrest, was justified by the officer’s legitimate concern about the potential presence of confederates in the area. We conclude that the district court’s ruling as to this search was correct. The second search occurred two hours later, after Murphy, who was residing in the units temporarily, had refused to consent but…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Horton v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Illinois v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Griffin v. ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Fernandez v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- United States v. ShraderCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. HendersonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Friedman v. BoucherCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.