Legal Opinion

Nelson v. State

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided January 2, 1964No. 353PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIMOND, Justice.

Appellant was convicted of taking a cub grizzly bear in violation of a state game regulation. His main points on this appeal are: (1) that the Board of Fish and Game was not empowered to prohibit the taking of cub bear; (2) that the regulation is void because it is vague and indefinite; (3) that the trial judge erred in denying appellant’s offer of proof designed to show an arbitrary enforcement of the regulation; and (4) that the judge erred in allowing a witness to give his opinion as to the age of the bear that appellant killed.

1.Power of the Board.

The game regulation in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Oyler v. BolesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Nash v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. United States v. BalintSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  5. State v. HicksOregon Supreme Court · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Lewis v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Alex v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Pedersen v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Kingery v. ChappleAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Suber v. Alaska State Bond CommitteeAlaska Supreme Court · 1966

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API