Nelson v. State
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DIMOND, Justice.
Appellant was convicted of taking a cub grizzly bear in violation of a state game regulation. His main points on this appeal are: (1) that the Board of Fish and Game was not empowered to prohibit the taking of cub bear; (2) that the regulation is void because it is vague and indefinite; (3) that the trial judge erred in denying appellant’s offer of proof designed to show an arbitrary enforcement of the regulation; and (4) that the judge erred in allowing a witness to give his opinion as to the age of the bear that appellant killed.
1.Power of the Board.
The game regulation in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Oyler v. BolesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Nash v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- United States v. BalintSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- State v. HicksOregon Supreme Court · 1958
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Lewis v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
- Alex v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
- Pedersen v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1966
- Kingery v. ChappleAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
- Suber v. Alaska State Bond CommitteeAlaska Supreme Court · 1966
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.