Legal Opinion

Mills v. Mutual Building & Loan Ass'n

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 3, 1940PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnhill, J.

1 Tbe instrument tbe plaintiff executed to secure tbe indebtedness to tbe corporate defendant contained tbe following provisions : “It being distinctly understood and agreed by tbe parties hereto *667that in tie event of default in compliance with tbe terms hereof for a period of thirty days that the party of the second part shall be entitled to enter into possession of said lands for the purpose of collecting the rents and profits arising therefrom and applying the same upon the debts hereby secured, and he is hereby authorized and empowered so to do without formality or process of law. But if…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Lee v. . PearceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1873
  2. McLeod v. . BullardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  3. Sutton v. AdamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  4. Eubanks v. BectonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  5. Gibson v. . BarbourSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Thompson v. SolesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Wansley v. First Nat. Bank of VicksburgMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
  3. In re the Foreclosure of the Deed of Trust of Vogler Realty, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2012
  4. Erickson v. StarlingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  5. Laws v. Priority Trustee Services of N.C., L.L.C.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2009

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API