Legal Opinion

In the Matter of a John Doe Grand Jury Investigation

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 12, 1989PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.

We deal with questions reported by a Superior Court judge arising out of the refusal of a witness, purportedly immunized by a single justice of this court, to testify before a Middlesex County grand jury. See G. L. c. 233, §§ 20C-20H (1986 ed.).

The questions come to us on a statement of agreed facts which we summarize. The witness, who was summoned before a grand jury that was investigating alleged violations of the conflict of interest and extortion statutes, validly claimed his privilege against self-incrimination. On application of the Attorney General, a single justice of this court…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Emery's caseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  3. Attorney General v. ColletonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  4. Taylor v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  5. In Re Carol VerickerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SullivanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  2. Commonwealth v. Austin A.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
  3. In the Matter of a Grand Jury InvestigationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API