In the Matter of a John Doe Grand Jury Investigation
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.
We deal with questions reported by a Superior Court judge arising out of the refusal of a witness, purportedly immunized by a single justice of this court, to testify before a Middlesex County grand jury. See G. L. c. 233, §§ 20C-20H (1986 ed.).
The questions come to us on a statement of agreed facts which we summarize. The witness, who was summoned before a grand jury that was investigating alleged violations of the conflict of interest and extortion statutes, validly claimed his privilege against self-incrimination. On application of the Attorney General, a single justice of this court…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Emery's caseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
- Attorney General v. ColletonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Taylor v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- In Re Carol VerickerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SullivanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
- Commonwealth v. Austin A.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
- In the Matter of a Grand Jury InvestigationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2020