Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Austin A.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 14, 2008PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCowin, J.

A judge in the Superior Court granted immunity pursuant to G. L. c. 233, § 20E,1 to a witness, whom we shall *666call Simon S., in criminal proceedings in that court. The Commonwealth filed a motion in limine in the Juvenile Court asking the court to “honor” the immunity order to prevent Simon from asserting his privilege against self-incrimination and compel him to testify regarding the same subjects in separate Juvenile Court proceedings involving the juvenile here. The motion was denied. The Commonwealth was granted leave to prosecute an interlocutory appeal, and a single justice of this court…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  4. Hanlon v. RollinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  5. Commonwealth v. FunchesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pixley v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
  2. Commonwealth v. TewoldeMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2015
  3. In the Matter of a Grand Jury InvestigationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API