Legal Opinion

Phaneuf v. Lustig, Glaser & Wilson P.C.

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided December 8, 2015No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-40081-TSHPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

HILLMAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Background

On July 1, 2015, Raymond Phaneuf (“Phaneuf’ or “Plaintiff’) filed a complaint against Lustig, Glaser & Wilson (“Lustig Glaser” or “Defendant”) alleging claims for violation of the Fair Debt Collections Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692e et seq. (“FDCPA”) (Docket No. 1). More specifically, Phaneuf alleged that Lustig Glaser violated the FDCPA by falsely representing the character, amount or legal status of his debt (Count I), communicating or threatening to communicate credit information which it knew to be false (Count II), misrepresenting the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Pomerleau v. West Springfield Public SchoolsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
  4. Brown v. Department of Veterans AffairsDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2006

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Golub v. Northeastern UniversityDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2020
  2. Johnson v. Sheriff Department PlymouthDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API