Legal Opinion
Rikoon v. Two Boro Dress, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 25, 1957PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJames S. Bkown, J.
In this foreclosure action plaintiffs move for an order confirming the Referee’s report of sale and directing the Referee to pay to plaintiffs the sum of $3,285.95 now held by the Referee as part of the proceeds of the sale and also for the payment to plaintiffs of the sum of $629.62 from the receiver’s funds, this latter sum being the amount of plaintiffs’ deficiency over and above the said $3,285.95. Defendant United States of America cross-moves for an order directing the Referee to correct his report in conformity with its objections and to pay to it the said sum of $3,285.95. A request…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. City of New BritainSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- York Mortgage Corp. v. Clotar Construction Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
- In Re the Distribution of the Proceeds of the Sale of the Real Estate of StilwellNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Wesselman v. Engel Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1955
- Field v. ChronikAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Buffalo Savings Bank v. Victory, New York County Courts1960
- Kronenberg v. Ellenville Nurseries & Greenhouses, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1960
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. United StatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
- Trefoil Capital Corp. v. Creed Taylor, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1984
- Buffalo Savings Bank v. VictoryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.