Legal Opinion

Eresch v. Quakenbush

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 5, 1938No. 33,540PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

HutChisoN, J.:

This was an action on account for money, expenses, and materials furnished in farming operations on an oral contract between plaintiff as landlord and the first-named defendant as tenant. It covers a period of nine years, and includes the raising of lambs, as well as farming. On account of drought and failure of crops plaintiff alleges defendant became greatly indebted to plaintiff because of being unable to meet the expenses of several of these intervening years; that in the summer of 1935 a new oral contract was made by them as to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bank of Denton v. JeschSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  2. Lillard v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  3. Bank of Santa Fe v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1900
  4. Hamilton v. Maas & Bros.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1884
  5. Johnson v. BeachSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Robertson Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  2. Schneider v. Ray (In Re Roberts)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API