Legal Opinion

Carawan v. . Barnett

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 9, 1929PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClarkson, J.

The-only question involved is whether or not a street assessment on a particular piece of land or lot abutting on a street in a municipality, duly and properly made according to law, should be paid by the personal representative of the party whose piece of land or lot is assessed or out of the land or lot? We think the land or lot bears the burden of the street assessment.

After alleging the facts “the petitioners -pray the court- for its direction as to the payment of the balance due on said street assessment, which balance, to date is $167.87 with interest.” Trust Co. v. Stevenson, 196 N.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. City of Raleigh v. PeaceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
  2. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co. v. StevensonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  3. Middle Canal Co. v. WhitleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  4. Pate v. . BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  5. Coble v. . DickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Wilkes County v. . ForesterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  2. Town of Saluda v. County of PolkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  3. Rigsbee v. . BrogdenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  4. Wilkes County v. ForesterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  5. City of Winston-Salem v. Powell Paving Co. of North Carolina, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API