Legal Opinion

Robinson v. Fluor-Daniel International Corp.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided March 15, 1991No. 2900085PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

THIGPEN, Judge.

This is a workmen’s compensation case.

R.C. Robinson initiated this action against Fluor-Daniel International Corporation (Fluor-Daniel) in October, 1989, alleging that he was injured while working for Fluor-Daniel on a job site in Tennessee on October 5, 1987. Fluor-Daniel, Inc., answered and, inter alia, filed a motion to dismiss pleading nul tiel corporation. After that motion was overruled, Fluor-Dan-iel, Inc., filed a motion for summary judgment with supporting documentation alleging that Robinson was employed in Tennessee and not subject to the Alabama workmen’s…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bass v. SOUTHTRUST BANK OF BALDWIN CTY.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Mann v. City of TallasseeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  3. Hall v. Chrysler Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  4. Seales by Seales v. Daniel Const. Co., Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1985
  5. CEMENT PRODUCTS CO., INC. v. MartinCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1981

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Robinson v. Fluor-Daniel International Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API