Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Robinson v. Fluor-Daniel International Corp.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 13, 1991No. 1901191PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

INGRAM, Justice.

R.C. Robinson sued Fluor-Daniel International Corporation to recover benefits that he alleged were due him under the provisions of the Alabama Workmen’s Compensation Act. Robinson alleged that he was hired by Fluor-Daniel in Alabama and that he suffered irreversible back and leg injuries as the result of an accident that occurred while he was working within the scope of his employment with Fluor-Daniel on a job site in Tennessee.

Fluor-Daniel answered Robinson’s complaint and filed a motion for summary judgment in which it asserted that the Alabama Workmen’s Compensation Act…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ohlhausen v. Sternberg Dredging Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1951
  2. Haverly v. Union Construction Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1945
  3. Chance v. Fidelity & Cas. Co. of New YorkLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1987
  4. City Products Corporation v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
  5. Seales by Seales v. Daniel Const. Co., Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Heartland Express v. GardnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
  2. Ex Parte Fluor CorporationCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2006
  3. Gillaspy v. Southern Erectors, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2014
  4. Ex Parte Fluor CorporationCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2006
  5. Robinson v. Fluor-Daniel International Corp.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API