Legal Opinion

Cooper v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 17, 2009No. E047002PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KING, J.

I. INTRODUCTION

The present appeal is from a judgment entered after the trial court’s grant of defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company’s (State Farm) motion for nonsuit, following plaintiff’s opening statement.

Plaintiff and appellant Bryan Cooper was an insured of State Farm. He was involved in a single-car accident allegedly caused by a tread separation of the right rear tire. As part of the collision damage settlement with plaintiff, State Farm acquired possession of the vehicle, including the right rear tire. State Farm had the tire examined by an expert, who…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Williams v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Erlich v. MenezesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Cedars-Sinai Medical Center v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Artiglio v. Corning Inc.California Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Oliver v. Stimson Lumber Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1999

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Douglas E. Barnhart, Inc. v. CMC Fabricators, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
  2. San Mateo Union High School District v. County of San MateoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  3. Hernandez v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  4. Prue v. Brady Company/San Diego, Inc. CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2015
  5. Rosen v. St. Joseph Hospital of Orange CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API