Legal Opinion

State v. Jerrel

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 27, 1968No. 44,969PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Fromme, J.:

The defendant Jerry Jerrel was convicted of possessing burglary tools in violation of K. S. A. 21-2437, he was sentenced under K. S. A. 21-107a as an habitual criminal, and he has appealed.

Jerry Jerrel and two companions, David Walter Hart and Neil N. Hart, were charged jointly. They demanded and received separate trials. The trial of David Walter Hart resulted in a conviction and his conviction was affirmed by this court in State v. Hart, 200 Kan. 153, 434 P. 2d 999.

In summary the state’s evidence in the trial of Jerry Jerrel indicated that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. HartSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  2. State v. WrightSupreme Court of Kansas · 1965
  3. Thompson v. NormanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  4. Schroeder v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
  5. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. GunbySupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  2. State v. StewardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  3. State v. TrotterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
  4. State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
  5. State v. McClanahanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API