State v. McClanahan
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Fromme, J.:
The present appeals were perfected by the state upon questions reserved relating to an identical instruction given in two separate criminal cases.
Carroll William McClanahan was acquitted by a jury of the offense of grand theft as defined in K. S. A. 1972 Supp. 21-3701 (a). Larry Dean Torrence was acquitted by a jury of the offense of burglary as defined in K. S. A. 1972 Supp. 21-3715. Separate ap peals were filed in this court and then consolidated on a stipulation by the parties that the questions are identical, and a decision in one case…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sparf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- State v. DoyleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968
- State v. OsburnSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
- Thompson v. NormanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
- Schroeder v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- State v. GustinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
- Hoskins v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. Smith-ParkerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. NaputiSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.