Legal Opinion

State v. McClanahan

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 12, 1973No. 47,012, 46,963PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Fromme, J.:

The present appeals were perfected by the state upon questions reserved relating to an identical instruction given in two separate criminal cases.

Carroll William McClanahan was acquitted by a jury of the offense of grand theft as defined in K. S. A. 1972 Supp. 21-3701 (a). Larry Dean Torrence was acquitted by a jury of the offense of burglary as defined in K. S. A. 1972 Supp. 21-3715. Separate ap peals were filed in this court and then consolidated on a stipulation by the parties that the questions are identical, and a decision in one case…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sparf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. State v. DoyleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968
  3. State v. OsburnSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  4. Thompson v. NormanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  5. Schroeder v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State v. GustinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  2. Hoskins v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
  3. State v. Smith-ParkerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  4. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  5. State v. NaputiSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API