People v. Harper
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.
These are automatic appeals (Pen. Code, § 1239(b)) from judgments sentencing each defendant to death, after verdicts finding them guilty of murder in the first degree without recommendation as to penalty, and, as to defendant Bolden, from an order denying his motion for a new trial. Each defendant was represented at the trial by able counsel but defendant Harper is without benefit of counsel on the appeal. As to him the proceedings appear to have been regular in all respects, we have discovered no prejudicial error, and his testimony alone, voluntarily given, amply supports the verdict of the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- People v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- People v. KauffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- People v. KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- People v. NegraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- People v. ClappCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- People v. GriffinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- People v. MoranteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- People v. WayneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- People v. WeissCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- People v. SimpsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.