Legal Opinion

Sletteland v. Roberts

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 2000No. 99-339PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hunt

¶1 James Sletteland brought this derivative action against two other shareholders, R. Lee Roberts and Owen Orndorff alleging breach of fiduciary duty and self-dealing, requesting a return of excessive legal fees and a removal of Orndorff and Roberts as directors. Roberts, Orndorff and a third shareholder, Jeff Smith, counterclaimed, alleging that Sletteland brought the suit in bad faith causing damage to the company and to the other shareholders. The District Court ruled for Sletteland on the initial complaint, and for Roberts and Orndorff on the counterclaim. Sletteland appeals, and Robert…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Busta Ex Rel. Busta v. Columbus Hospital Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Unified Industries, Inc. v. EasleyMontana Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Carelli v. HallMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Rudeck v. WrightMontana Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Daniels v. Thomas, Dean & Hoskins, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Kiely Construction, L.L.C. v. City of Red Lodge Ex Rel. Red Lodge City CouncilMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Whitehorn v. Whitehorn Farms, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Graveley Simmental Ranch Co. v. QuigleyMontana Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Yurczyk v. Yellowstone CountyMontana Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Hansen v. GRANITE COUNTYMontana Supreme Court · 2010

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API