Legal Opinion

Bushy v. Forster

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 27, 1998No. SC 15604PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MCDONALD, J.

The sole issue in this appeal is whether the Appellate Court correctly concluded that the trial court abused its discretion by insufficiently commenting on the evidence in its charge to the jury. We conclude that the trial court adequately instructed the jury and accordingly reverse the judgment of the Appellate Court.

The plaintiff, Terry K. Bushy,1 filed a complaint, alleging negligence and nuisance by the defendants, George E. Forster and Judith A. Forster, for events relating to the plaintiffs fall at the defendants’ apartment building where the plaintiff was a tenant.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. LemoineSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  2. Bushy v. ForsterConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
  3. Bushy v. ForsterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  4. Bushy v. ForsterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. SotomayorConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  2. State v. MoyeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
  3. Bushy v. ForsterConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API