Legal Opinion
Bushy v. Forster
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 1, 1998No. AC 12729PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
2Per curiam
This case comes to us on remand from our Supreme Court. We previously reversed the judgment of the trial court because in its charge to the jury, the trial court failed to relate the law to the factual issues in the case. Bushy v. Forster, 43 Conn. App. 578, 684 A.2d 739 (1996). Our Supreme Court reversed our decision; Bushy v. Forster, 243 Conn. 596, 706 A.2d 8 (1998); stating that “[t]his was a simple case, presented in six days, where the evidence was not complicated. The issues concerning the landlord’s negligence in the maintenance of the building’s roof drainage system and the…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Connecticut National Bank v. GiacomiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- State v. HendersonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Bushy v. ForsterConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Bushy v. ForsterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
4Cited by5 opinions
- Rafalko v. University of New HavenConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- State v. MoyeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Ancona v. Warden, No. Cv01-034 44 00 S (Mar. 25, 2003)Connecticut Superior Court · 2003
- Bushy v. ForsterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- State v. ColtherstConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019