Victor Cotton Oil Co. v. City of Louisville
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court (Chancery Branch, Second Division).
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Chief Justice Hobson
Affirming.
Some years ago, the Globe Refining Company operated a factory in Louisville. It was not successful and transferred the property to the Globe Refinery Company, which operated it until March, 1904, when it ceased operations and turned over its property to the Fidelity Trust Company as liquidating agent. The Fidelity Trust Company placed a watcjiman in charge of the factory, and made different efforts to sell the property which were unsuccessful. In July, 1904, five stockholders of the Globe Refinery Company incorporated the Victor Cotton Oil…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Morawick v. Martineck's GuardianCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
- Jones Bros. v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
- Mengel Box Co. v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1904
3Cited by11 opinions
- Oliver Co. v. Louisville Realty Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
- Libby v. City of DillinghamAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
- City of Lexington v. Lexington Leader Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
- Standard Tailoring Co. v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
- Elam v. SalisburyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.