Legal Opinion
Haynes v. United States
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided July 26, 2006No. CIV. PJM 02-3850, CRIM. PJM 98-0520PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MESSITTE, District Judge.
Willis Mark Haynes, pro se, has filed a Motion Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence By A Person in Federal Custody. No hearing is necessary to dispose of the matter. See Local Rule 105.6 (D.Md.2001). Having considered the Motion, the Government’s Opposition and Haynes’ Reply, the Court DENIES the Motion.
I
Following a jury trial, Haynes was convicted of three counts of first-degree murder in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1111(a), three counts of kidnapping in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1201(a), and three counts of using a handgun during and…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. HiggsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
- Haskell v. BerghuisDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2010
- United States v. HarrisDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2009
- Fortune v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2013
- Basham v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.