Legal Opinion

Invessys, Inc. v. McGraw-Hill Companies, Ltd.

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided May 21, 2004No. 03-1954PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOUDIN, Chief Judge.

Defendants — The McGraw-Hill Companies, Ltd., and The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. (together “McGraw-Hill”) — successfully defended themselves against a lawsuit brought by plaintiffs InvesSys, Inc. (“InvesSys”), and Peter Hodges. One of the claims in the complaint was for copyright infringement and, at the end of the case, the district court awarded attorney’s fees and costs to McGraw-Hill under the Copyright Act. 17 U.S.C. § 505 (2000). Plaintiffs now appeal, contesting the award.

The background facts are as follows. During the spring of 2000, McGraw-Hill became interested…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. West Virginia University Hospitals, Inc. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. T. B. Harms Company v. Edward Eliscu and Ross Jungnickel, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
  5. Case v. Unified School District No. 233Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Valentine v. Mountain States Mutual Casualty Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. Sorbo v. United Parcel ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  3. Catherine Balsley v. LFP, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  4. Trustees of the Construction Industry v. Redland InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  5. García-Goyco v. Law Environmental Consultants, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API