In re the Act of October 7, 1976, P.L. 1101, No. 223, Providing for Increase in Salaries of County Officers
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
President Judge Crumlish, Jr.,
Although our holding today on this appeal is of enormous consequence to county officials across the Commonwealth, the issue is deceptively simple: whether elected county officials, who had received compensation increases under a state statute which was subsequently declared by our Supreme Court to be constitutionally inapplicable, are required now to reimburse the county for such unauthorized receipts.
The Act of October 7, 1976, P.L. 1101, 16 P.S. ^llOll-l1 (hereinafter “Act 223”) establishes compensation increases for certain county officials; Section…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Burke v. Pittsburgh Limestone Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Delaware River Port Authority v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Consumers Education & Protective Ass'n v. SchwartzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- County of Allegheny v. GrierSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
- Loushay AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Yocabet v. STATE ETHICS COMM.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- MURPHY v. BradleyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- McGuire v. State Ethics CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Carolina Freight Carriers Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- In re Jim Thorpe Borough Liquor Store ProtestCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.