In re Bergström & Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the petitioners, Oscar B. Bergstrom and another, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Hew York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Hew York on the 8tli day of February, 1909, denying a motion to compel A. Livingston Horman, an attorney, to deliver over certain papers.
1Opinion of the Court
Ingraham, J:
The papers of which the petitioners sought to obtain possession consisted of the printed record of a case on appeal to the Court of Appeals, the petitioners being parties to the action in which the appeal was pending. The petition alleges that the petitioners were defendants in an action pending in the Supreme Court of Kings county wherein one Ridgely was the plaintiff. One of the petitioners, being an attorney of this court, was the attorney of record for the defendants in that action, but Mr. Horman had appeared for the petitioners as counsel. That action was tried and resulted…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Ridgely v. . BergstromNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
- Ridgely v. BergstromAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
3Cited by3 opinions
- Matter of HollinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
- Kennedy v. MacalusoNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- In re BergströmAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909