Legal Opinion

Kennedy v. Macaluso

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 6, 1982PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [b]), order affirmed, with costs. An attorney has no retaining lien on an executed but unfiled divorce decree (see Matter of Bergstrom & Co., 131 App Div 791; Matter of Reiss, 200 Misc 697) and may be compelled, via a CPLR article 78 proceeding in the nature of mandamus, to file such decree.

*632Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of ReissNew York Surrogate's Court · 1951
  2. In re Bergström & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Akivis v. BrecherNew York Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Beirman v. MacalusoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  3. Milevoi v. Conciliation & Appeals BoardNew York Supreme Court · 1985
  4. People v. OwensNew York Supreme Court · 2000