Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Peterson

Pennylvania Municipal Court, Philadelphia County

Decided May 6, 1930PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lewis, J.,

William E. Peterson, one of the defendants, during the course of his employment with the Manhattan Fire Proofing Company, sustained injuries, as a consequence of which he has been disabled since April 10, 1929. He became entitled to receive, and is now receiving, compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Law of the State of Pennsylvania, amounting to $14.30 per week.

His wife, Daisy Peterson, filed her petition in this court, asking for an order for support of herself and her two minor children, alleging a desertion by her husband and a failure to provide for his family.

The…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Wetmore v. MarkoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. Dunbar v. DunbarSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  3. Mackin v. Detroit-Timkin Axle Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Moorehead's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  5. Hidden v. JordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Interinsurance Exchange of the Automobile Club v. Ohio Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Interinsurance Exchange of the Automobile Club v. Ohio Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API