Legal Opinion
Ross v. Damm
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided December 28, 1936No. Docket No. 20, Calendar No. 39,083PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.
The issues involved in this cause pertain to a triangular strip of land with an area of 4.166 acres, the point of which borders on Bear lake in Muskegon county. This case was before this court once before and is reported in 271 Mich. 474 to which reference is made for facts unnecessary to be stated herein. The scope of the inquiry in the present cause is indicated by the following quotation from page 483 of the opinion above referred to.
“The record does not show whether Damm has made valuable improvements on the triangular strip between the lines FE' and EE' which cannot be removed. If so, it…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Daughetee v. Ohio Oil Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1914
- Attorney General v. Pere Marquette Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933
- Ross v. DammMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
- Junction Oil & Gas Co. v. PrattSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
3Cited by11 opinions
- Cotiga Development Co. v. United Fuel Gas Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1962
- Elliff v. Texon Drilling. Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1948
- Wronski v. Sun Oil CompanyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
- Empire Oil & Refining Co. v. HoytCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1940
- Klyman v. City of TroyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.