Junction Oil & Gas Co. v. Pratt
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
MAXEY, C.
Counsel for plaintiffs in erro? has not set out and argued his assignments of error separately and does not even set out his assignments of error in his brief except so far as they are contained in his motion for new trial. There is, however, an assignment of error attached to the record of the overruling of motion for a new trial, and this assignment, under the practice prevailing in this jurisdiction, is so broad as to cover the other assignments of error, and we shall discuss the points discussed in plaintiffs in error’s brief, as near as we can understand them. As we…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pelham Petroleum Co. v. NorthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Eastern Oil Co. v. BeattySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Blackwell Oil & Gas Co. v. WhitesidesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Daughetee v. Ohio Oil Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1909
3Cited by9 opinions
- Cotiga Development Co. v. United Fuel Gas Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1962
- Julian Petroleum Corporation v. Courtney Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927
- Ross v. DammMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
- Deep Rock Oil Corp. v. BilbySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
- Poe v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1926
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.