Legal Opinion

Hyland Lakes Spuds, Inc. v. H.C. Schmieding Produce Co.

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided December 3, 1998No. 98-C-785Published

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

CALLAHAN, United States Magistrate Judge.

Background

On August 14, 1998, the plaintiff, Hyland Lakes Spuds, Inc., (“Hyland”) filed this action against defendant H.C. Schmieding Produce Co., Inc., (“Schmieding”). In its first claim Hyland alleges that it is a seller of potatoes, which are a perishable agricultural commodity within the meaning of 7 U.S.C. § 499a; that Schmieding was, at all material times, a “dealer” within the meaning of that term as found in 7 U.S.C. § 499a; and, that during 1997, Hyland sold Schmieding various shipments of potatoes pursuant to a contract…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Paper Express, Limited, an Illinois Corporation v. Pfankuch Maschinen Gmbh, a German CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  2. Keaty v. Freeport Indonesia, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  3. In Re Fireman's Fund Insurance CompaniesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  4. Full-Sight Contact Lens Corp. v. Soft Lenses, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1978
  5. Docksider, Ltd. v. Sea Technology, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API