Legal Opinion

State v. . Roberts

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 6, 1929PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrogden, J.

The trial judge charged the jury as follows: “If you find from all the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that — under these circumstances I have given you — that he has not provided adequate support during that time, taking in consideration his circumstances in life and his means, you will return a verdict of guilty; if you are not so satisfied, or if you have a reasonable doubt about it, you will return a verdict of not guilty.”

The defendant excepted to the charge as given upon the ground that it omitted the essential element of wilfulness. The exception is sustained. S. v. Yelverton, 196…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. . FalknerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  2. State v. . YelvertonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. . CookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  2. State v. . HinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API