Legal Opinion · Dissent

Goldstein v. Commission on Practice of the Supreme Court

Montana Supreme Court

Decided January 13, 2000No. 97-557 and 98-011Published

1DissentJustice Nelson

¶52 I dissent from the Court’s decision that Rules 9 and 13 of the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement (hereafter, simply referred to as Rules or Rule) do not deny a respondent attorney due process of law. I conclude and would hold that the rules fail in this regard and, accordingly, are violative of Montana’s Constitution, Article II, Section 17.1 also conclude and would hold that Rule 13 is unconstitutional as violative of Montana’s Constitution, Article II, Section 9.

*507 Introduction

¶53 Before commencing my discussion of the law, I want to make one thing unequivocally clear. My dissent…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Cafeteria & Restaurant Workers Union, Local 473 v. McElroySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. In Re Murchison.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  5. Arkansas v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API